I dont hold a patent on Krishna
Hare Krishna. I didnt want this topic to continue in Radhashtami and so have moved it here.
>>But it is the case many a times. I can distinguish between your ongoing generic comments and specific comments and replies.
Wow, you are really in touch with the Supersoul to read my mind.
>>Also, some comments were directly addressed to me - like who has the license to KrushNa, "sugar-coated PUtnA bhakti", "speaking to KrushNa directly is mayavadi" etc. For some reason i thought that bitterness had gone, and i forget too quickly (despite His warnings). I love devotees.
Yes, I did address certain things to you but have given up long back. Srila Prabhupada made his life mission of combating the Mayavadis. And everywhere I turn they are dime a dozen. And I speak on the basis of shastra and guru, and not what Krishna tells me personally because I am not so fortunate.
>>I belong to KrushNa and ONLY KrushNa.
We all belong only to Krishna and Krishna is for everyone, not just the devotees. Everyone is on His path. But that does not mean everyone wants Him. It is Krishna who says who has a "license to Him". Some want Him in the form of material results, some in the form of Brahman and some just want to serve Him. So everyone can approach Him and there is no bar.
Krishna is not cheap. If that is so, He wouldnt say manushyanam sahasreshu, which explains His vijnana aspect - His sweetness.
Radhikesh das

What makes you insist i am a Mayavadi ?
It makes no sense. What am i going to do with an impersonal Brahman ?
And i am not suggesting that KrushNa is cheap. He is bhakta vatsal.
Hare KrushNa
_/\_
Hare Krishna.
I typed a reply but realized I am deviating too much from Krsna katha. If you would like a reply, you can write to my email address.
Radhikesh das