Dear visitors and supporters, our prayers are with you and your loved ones right now. May you stay healthy and safe. May you always remember Krishna, especially in times like these. We've been posting lots of inspirational content on our Facebook page (please like the page to be notified), and we're working on updating this website with a new look. If you would like to support's missionary effort to spread Krishna consciousness for the benefit of all, please give a donation.

SB 1.3 - The paribhāṣa-sūtra of Bhāgavatam

Now how can we establish Kṛṣṇa is the complete form of God on the basis of one statement when there are apparently other statements that refute this. For instance SB 10.1.2 says to describe the wonderful activities of the expansion of Lord Viṣṇu, who appeared in the Yadu dynasty (tatra amśenāvatīrṇasya viṣṇor). SB 10.2.41 says the Supreme Lord Himself as an expansion is now within the womb of Devakī (amśena sākṣād bhagavān).

In the beginning of Bhāgavatam, this chapter concerning the appearance of the Lord is called a sūtra, since it threads together statements concerning all avatāras. And in this chapter this verse 1.3.28 is a paribhāṣa-sūtra, which supplies a general definition for the whole work. A paribhāṣa-sūtra regulates something that is not otherwise regulated; it creates a rule or restriction where none existed previously. A book’s paribhāṣa-sūtra acts as a lens thru which the entire book can be seen. It dictates how all succeeding points in the book should be interpreted. In a lengthy Sanskrit work containing many indirect meanings, the author’s true and consistent intention can be understood thru the book’s paribhāṣa-sūtra. Both Jīva Gosvāmī and Śrīdhara Svāmī accept this verse as the paribhāṣa-sūtra of Bhāgavatam. Thus wherever avatāras are described in the Bhāgavatam, others should be knows as expansions of the puruṣāvatāras, but Kṛṣṇa should be known as svayam bhagavān. Thus the above objection that Kṛṣṇa is an aṁśa is addressed.